On 29/03/2013 07:33, Michael StJohns wrote:
> At 01:14 AM 3/29/2013, David Kessens wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:03:25PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
>>> The process for selecting and appointing liaisons is the purview of the
>>> IAB and not currently subject to external revi
At 01:14 AM 3/29/2013, David Kessens wrote:
>Mike,
>
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:03:25PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
>>
>> The process for selecting and appointing liaisons is the purview of the
>> IAB and not currently subject to external review - and I don't find any
>> problem with that.
>
>I
At 10:02 AM 3/28/2013, John C Klensin wrote:
> For me, it seems especially odd when
>compared to the liaison position to the ICANN Board. Both are
>very important to the IETF community. Both involve
>organizations with which the IETF has a complicated and
>multidimensional relationship. Both i
Mike,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:03:25PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> The process for selecting and appointing liaisons is the purview of the
> IAB and not currently subject to external review - and I don't find any
> problem with that.
I fully agree with this.
All I am asking for is a cal
On 3/28/2013 6:03 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
Seriously - can we stop second guessing the IESG, IAB and IAOC on everything?
That's not what's being done, Mike, and such hyperbole doesn't
facilitate meaningful exchange.
There have been two exceptions raised -- one about diversity and this
The IETF and various members occasionally break out in back seat driver's
syndrome. It's disappointing.
We need to remember that we are organized more as a republic than a democracy.
We select various folks through the Nomcom process to make decisions on various
things. E.g.. the IESG for st
That was the British use of the term "unlikely".
Stewart
Sent from my iPad
On 28 Mar 2013, at 14:05, "Dave Crocker" wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/2013 6:13 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>> In this particular case the candidate pool would have been tiny,
>> because the criteria would surely have included
--On Thursday, March 28, 2013 18:28 +0100 Carsten Bormann
wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 22:26, David Kessens
> wrote:
>
>> Recently, there has been a lot of discussion in the IETF
>> about diversity.
>
> Is it just me or is the liaison manager for the politically
> tempestuous ITU-T relations
On 3/28/2013 6:13 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
In this particular case the candidate pool would have been tiny,
because the criteria would surely have included being experienced
with both the ITU process and the IETF liaison process, including
knowing and understanding the liaison history. Therefo
On Mar 27, 2013, at 22:26, David Kessens wrote:
> Recently, there has been a lot of discussion in the IETF about diversity.
Is it just me or is the liaison manager for the politically tempestuous ITU-T
relationship really about the worst possible position to exercise this point on?
Choose your
On 3/28/13 5:13 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Therefore it
> seems unlikely that there would be any candidate that the IAB
> did not already know about. So whilst I agree in general,
> this is not a case that should raise any concerns.
Wow.
Allow me to suggest that even if you think this is true,
g
nt of Scott Mansfield as new IETF Liaison Manager
> to the ITU-T
>
>
> Stewart,
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:13:44PM +, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> >
> > In this particular case the candidate pool would have been tiny,
> > because the criteria would surel
Stewart,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:13:44PM +, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
> In this particular case the candidate pool would have been tiny,
> because the criteria would surely have included being experienced
> with both the ITU process and the IETF liaison process, including
> knowing and unde
--On Thursday, March 28, 2013 13:13 + Stewart Bryant
wrote:
> David
>
> In this particular case the candidate pool would have been
> tiny, because the criteria would surely have included being
> experienced with both the ITU process and the IETF liaison
> process, including knowing and und
e IAB, and I am sure he will provide valuable support for Scott.
Thanks,
Russ
= = = = = = = = = =
Liaison Statement: Appointment of Scott Mansfield as new IETF Liaison Manager
to the ITU-T
Submission Date: 27 March 2013
From: The IAB (Russ Housley)
To: ITU-T TSAG (tsbt...@itu.int)
Cc: IAB
gt; seat on the IAB, and I am sure he will provide valuable support for Scott.
>
> Thanks,
> Russ
>
> = = = = = = = = = =
>
> Liaison Statement: Appointment of Scott Mansfield as new IETF Liaison Manager
> to the ITU-T
> Submission Date: 27 March 2013
> From: The
16 matches
Mail list logo