On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:36:17AM +, Greg Skinner wrote:
FWIW, I reread Russ Housley's comments on the outage, and understand
it to be an experiment that is voluntary (but encouraged). Perhaps
this needs to be stated differently (e.g. IPv6 experiment planned for
IETF71 Plenary).
I think
Theodore Tso wrote:
I think the real issue here is the difference between what was
originally stated (I think first by Marshall Rose in the Open Book) as
the difference between the ISO, promulgating OSI, and the IETF,
promulgating TCP/IP --- which was that ISO was populated primarily by
from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 02:12 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: Chris Lonvick
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject:Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a question of ambition. At sixteen I was interested in mastering
the computer at its most fundamental level. I wrote arcade games in
6502 and Z80 assembler.
Today the idea of booting linux on a laptop would not make my top ten,
hundred or
(www.good.com)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 01:44 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject:Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for
IETF71 Plenary
Pacific Standard Time
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for
IETF71 Plenary
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a question of ambition. At sixteen I was interested in mastering
Hi,
Several people have written on this thread that they might not participate
in this experiment because they either won't have an IPv6 stack or that
they're unwilling to experiment with the network settings on their PCs.
I'll suggest that those people can double their experimental fun in a
Chris Lonvick wrote:
Hi,
Several people have written on this thread that they might not
participate in this experiment because they either won't have an IPv6
stack or that they're unwilling to experiment with the network settings
on their PCs. I'll suggest that those people can double
TS Glassey wrote:
FWIW I have run into many people using down-rev laptop's for whom
Microsoft's v6 implementation isn't ever going to be installed.
See http://research.microsoft.com/msripv6/msripv6.htm - I found
that via Jordi's http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/ link. Apparently
an
