Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-13 Thread Bill Manning
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:16:37PM -0800, David Conrad wrote: On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: Clearly the root operators are responsible to and accountable to the Internet community. Err, no. First, the root server operators are all independent actors performing

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Steve Crocker st...@shinkuro.com wrote: Full disclosure: I serve on the ICANN board of directors, and I chair ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC).  Both of these are volunteer, i.e. unpaid, positions, but ICANN does pay my travel expenses for

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Steve Crocker st...@shinkuro.com wrote: One of the problems of living in the US is that there is really very little experience of long lived institutions. Let us stipulate for the sake of argument that all the current staff are competent, what guarantees do we

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Steve Crocker st...@shinkuro.com wrote: On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:30 PM, John R. Levine wrote: This is multiple pieces of nonsense: I actually don't think we have any serious disagreement here.  ICANN's management of the root zone is cautious for all sorts of

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread David Conrad
On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: Clearly the root operators are responsible to and accountable to the Internet community. Err, no. First, the root server operators are all independent actors performing a service for the Internet community for their own reasons. They

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread Dave CROCKER
David Conrad wrote: There is no magic here. Oh good grief. You are clearly entirely too close to this. It is /all/ f'ing magic. Every f'ing thing about the Internet is magic. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/10/09 6:27 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: David Conrad wrote: There is no magic here. Oh good grief. You are clearly entirely too close to this. It is /all/ f'ing magic. Every f'ing thing about the Internet is magic. Any

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message a123a5d60911060930i691985f0re23a12155dc38...@mail.gmail.com, Phill ip Hallam-Baker writes: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Steve Crocker st...@shinkuro.com wrote: On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:30 PM, John R. Levine wrote: This is multiple pieces of nonsense: I actually don't think

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-07 Thread Bill Manning
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 05:28:52AM -0500, Steve Crocker wrote: On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:30 PM, John R. Levine wrote: I actually don't think we have any serious disagreement here. ICANN's management of the root zone is cautious for all sorts of reasons, and as you note the root server

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-11-05 Thread Steve Crocker
Full disclosure: I serve on the ICANN board of directors, and I chair ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC). Both of these are volunteer, i.e. unpaid, positions, but ICANN does pay my travel expenses for meetings. It's mildly amusing to see how this thread has drifted

Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths

2009-11-05 Thread John R. Levine
Agreed, except for the surprise part. The whole staff is paid impressively large amounts and has been as long as I've been watching ICANN. They seem to feel that their peer organizations for compensation purposes are investment banks rather than other non-profits. I don't have access to

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-11-01 Thread joel jaeggli
Doug Ewell wrote: Paul Hoffman paul dot hoffman at vpnc dot org wrote: Take the past two day's of press coverage for ICANN, for example. They are being lauded for making the domain name system usable in other scripts as if this was their doing. Nothing in ICANN's press releases pointed out

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
, 30 Oct 2009 13:04:00 -0700 (PDT) To: The IETF ietf@ietf.org Subject: Circle of Fifths Maybe we should invite this guy to our plenary, it's been a while since we heard drums or anything similar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iCVGkeLvaQ And look at ALL those sponsors ;-) Ole

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Ole Jacobsen
way. In fact, if they are able to exist (and make money) is because we do protocols, right ? Regards, Jordi From: Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:04:00 -0700 (PDT) To: The IETF ietf@ietf.org Subject: Circle

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Dave CROCKER
Ole Jacobsen wrote: Maybe we should invite this guy to our plenary, it's been a while since we heard drums or anything similar: Well, even given the way he plays, I am pretty sure that a guitar is not classed as a percussion instrument... Perhaps if we stopped banging out specs and

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 2:55 AM -0700 10/31/09, Ole Jacobsen wrote: You're not the first one to suggest that, but they do have a very different business model including covering travel for certain people and charging no meeting fees. It might make sense for us to approach the domain industry directly though... The

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Ole Jacobsen
Millions of dollars of PR value? What exactly does that mean, Paul? More to the point: How is ICANN funded? Unless I'm mistaken, they are funded by registrar/registry fees and, yes, application for new TLD fees, all of which comes from a healthy domain industry. That's not to say that ICANN

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 9:07 AM -0700 10/31/09, Ole Jacobsen wrote: Millions of dollars of PR value? What exactly does that mean, Paul? Legitimacy by publicity. Having their name (well, mostly their acronym) repeated in every news venue across the world. That legitimacy is just as important to ICANN as it is to,

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Doug Ewell
Paul Hoffman paul dot hoffman at vpnc dot org wrote: Take the past two day's of press coverage for ICANN, for example. They are being lauded for making the domain name system usable in other scripts as if this was their doing. Nothing in ICANN's press releases pointed out that literally tens

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread Doug Barton
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: Actually ICANN/IANA should contribute to IETF, possibly no just via sponsorship but a more stable way. You mean above and beyond providing the IANA function? -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!

Re: funding the IETF, was Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread John Levine
More to the point: How is ICANN funded? Unless I'm mistaken, they are funded by registrar/registry fees and, yes, application for new TLD fees, all of which comes from a healthy domain industry. ... Fully agree. It is flowing from many smaller players into a central repository, ICANN. Thus, it

Re: Circle of Fifths

2009-10-31 Thread David Morris
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Doug Ewell wrote: Paul Hoffman paul dot hoffman at vpnc dot org wrote: Take the past two day's of press coverage for ICANN, for example. They are being lauded for making the domain name system usable in other scripts as if this was their doing. Nothing in ICANN's press

Circle of Fifths

2009-10-30 Thread Ole Jacobsen
Maybe we should invite this guy to our plenary, it's been a while since we heard drums or anything similar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iCVGkeLvaQ And look at ALL those sponsors ;-) Ole Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal Cisco Systems Tel: +1