Hi, Bernard,
I had some comments on your comments (below):
- Original Message -
From: Bernard Aboba
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 12:16 PM
Subject: Comments on draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis-02.txt
Section 2.1
All SIP extensions considered
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Do all [SIP] option tags really need to be standards track?
I would argue that they do. Option tags define normative extensions to
the core SIP protocol. The prospect of defining a SIP protocol extension
in, say, an informational or historical document seems rather
Section 2.1
All SIP extensions considered in SIPCORE must be standards track.
Is this statement will really necessary in this document, or would it
be better suited for inclusion in the SIPCORE WG charter?
Typical IETF working groups do not live forever; SIPCORE's charter is
however
