(Subject line changed to reflect my belief that this is not
about 5892bis. I've also removed the copy to the gen-art list
-- if this isn't about 5892bis, it isn't on their agenda, even
though Roni's review may have partially stimulated the thread.)
--On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 19:45 -0700 Paul
The discussion make it clear to me that the tasks for IANA are not clear. It
seems that there needs to be a table for each supported version of Unicode.
Thats document should state that clearly. It is a point where RFC 5892 seems
to be vague, and we should take this opportunity to remove
