Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-02 Thread Steven Pemberton
From: "James P. Salsman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Device upload -- of any kind -- has not yet been implemented in Opera. Which is not actually the fault of the HTML WG. You know that the CTO of Opera software has said they will wait for a W3C Recommendation (or Working Draft) on device upload. I

Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-02 Thread James P. Salsman
Dear Dr. Pemberton, Thank you for your reply: I am sure we both want to resolve this. Would you please list all the flaws of which you are aware -- with as little or as much detail as you have time for -- along with, when available, how they could be fixed? I promise you I will devote my

RE: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-02 Thread Newland Moorefield
Title: RE: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position what is wrong with all you people? i subscribed to this god-forsaken listserv hoping that i'd learn something. all i've learned is that you're a bunch of negative, argumentative, anti-collaborative bores. shame on you

Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-01 Thread James P. Salsman
Dear Dr. Pemberton, Thanks for your message: There is nothing in HTML 4 that excludes any platform. Just look at Opera, which is being implemented on BeOs, Epoc, Linux, Mac Os, OS/2 and Windows. Device upload -- of any kind -- has not yet been implemented in Opera. You know that the CTO

Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-01 Thread Paul Hoffman / IMC
Why is this thread being run on the IETF mailing list? The IETF handed off responsibility for HTML to the W3C long ago. If the reason is to show people that someone has a beef with the way that the W3C is handling HTML, that point has been made. (I can already picture certain IETF folks

Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 01 Mar 2000 22:16:36 GMT, Lloyd Wood said: When did the IETF ever have responsibility for HTML, exactly? Well, searching for 'html' or 'hypertext' in rfc-index.tct, I find: 1866 Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0. T. Berners-Lee, D. Connolly. November 1995. (Format: TXT=146904 bytes)

RE: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-03-01 Thread Sonny Ghosh
Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Dear Dr. Pemberton, Thanks for your message: There is nothing in HTML 4 that excludes any platform. Just look at Opera, which is being implemented on BeOs, Epoc, Linux, Mac Os, OS/2 and Windows. Device upload -- of any kind -- h

Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-02-28 Thread Steven Pemberton
From: "James P. Salsman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: URGENT: W3C web form standards for device input and upload Thursday evening I spoke with a member of the W3C HTML Working Group who removed all my remaining doubt that the HTML WG has any serious support for open, non-proprietary web form

Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position

2000-02-28 Thread James P. Salsman
Dear Dr. Pemberton, Thank you for your message. I hope this one gets through. Some of my email to W3C lists (e.g., www-forms) has not appeared in the archives. You state that there are comments regarding how the device upload proposal can be improved. Please publish them, with my replies