Hi Nikos -
Unfortunately, [0] isn't a great reference to try and make this point:
1) It was published 20 years ago when we all of this was still in flux.
2) It's an algorithm description for crypto that's useful in certain
situations, not a protocol (e.g. we've got multiple digital signature
al
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
> Hi -
> I'm confused about this approval.
> As I read the draft and the approval comments, this document is an
> independent submission describing how to do C12.22 over IP. But the document
> is without context for "who does this" typical
Hi -
I'm confused about this approval.
As I read the draft and the approval comments, this document is an independent
submission describing how to do C12.22 over IP. But the document is without
context for "who does this" typical to an informational RFC.
Is this
a) A document describing ho
