will there be the capability to support dyn update for 6bone delegations?
--
--bill
I don't ever recall anybody bothering to ask application developers
whether
it was okay for DHCP servers (much less NATs) to break open connections.
This is a bit of a red herring--as actually implemented, most DHCP servers
provide leases long enough that your IP number doesn't change unless
I don't ever recall anybody bothering to ask application developers
whether it was okay for DHCP servers (much less NATs) to break open
connections
This is a bit of a red herring--as actually implemented, most DHCP servers
provide leases long enough that your IP number doesn't change
Many ISPs routinely use DHCP as an means to degrade their customers'
address stability, forcing them change addresses as often as once a day,
in order to prevent their customers from running certain kinds of
applications.
Yeah, and others do the same thing by, say, having their firewalls block
On 2/27/02 at 2:00 PM -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
I guess my question is how valuable this is. As far as I can tell,
stable DNS names are of limited utility unless the underlying IP
address(es) are also stable.
I can think of several uses:
1. I'm in a place with lousy or expensive
i use it so that hosts at home can run scripts such as
scp foo laptop:
randy
Many ISPs routinely use DHCP as an means to degrade their customers'
address stability, forcing them change addresses as often as once a day,
in order to prevent their customers from running certain kinds of
applications
Yeah, and others do the same thing by, say, having their firewalls
At the 53rd IETF in Minneapolis, the network will be running with dynamic
updated reverse DNS.
If configured on your laptop and at your home name server, this will
enable you to get a dynamically allocated address which has your own
domain name both in the forward zone and in the reverse zone.
If configured on your laptop and at your home name server, this will
enable you to get a dynamically allocated address which has your own
domain name both in the forward zone and in the reverse zone.
Fantastic. My laptop's DNS name is lust.indecency.org. Please arrange
for the records for
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:42:09 EST, Keith Moore said:
If configured on your laptop and at your home name server, this will
enable you to get a dynamically allocated address which has your own
domain name both in the forward zone and in the reverse zone.
Fantastic. My laptop's DNS name is
If configured on your laptop and at your home name server, this will
enable you to get a dynamically allocated address which has your own
domain name both in the forward zone and in the reverse zone.
Fantastic. My laptop's DNS name is lust.indecency.org. Please arrange
for the records for
What? No DNSSEC? ;)
if you *read* the web page, you will find a setion labeled Updating
Signed Zones in the 5. Limitations and Possible Complications section.
this stuff is not yet made simple. it's been enough fun to make it work
reliably. folk will probably actually have to read the doc.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:33:08 PST, Randy Bush said:
if you *read* the web page, you will find a setion labeled Updating
Signed Zones in the 5. Limitations and Possible Complications section.
Yeah - I just wanted to make sure people understood it's *not* as simple
as Keith's note made it
If configured on your laptop and at your home name server, this will
enable you to get a dynamically allocated address which has your own
domain name both in the forward zone and in the reverse zone.
Fantastic. My laptop's DNS name is lust.indecency.org. Please arrange
for the records
what jakob's message was saying is that the in-addr.arpa and ip6.arpa
zones will be correctly configured to work with the ietf net's correctly
configured dhcp server.
I appreciate the effort that has been made to set this up, and I'll
look forward to seeing whether it really does make a
we are hoping that this exercise will do the same for dynamic dns
update with dhcp.
I guess my question is how valuable this is. As far as I can tell,
stable DNS names are of limited utility unless the underlying IP
address(es) are also stable. But the best way to find out is to
try it,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
note, folk not running unix or linux will not be able to play. we still
need a hack to make the windows dhcp client wiggle.
What about people who have zero intention to run either IPv4 or DHCP?
(no I didn't read the document except to check it didn't
What about people who have zero intention to run either IPv4 or DHCP?
sorry, if you READ THE DOCUMENT, you will see that this is a dhcp-dns
experiment. if you don't run dhcp, or don't run dns, sorry.
randy
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Pekka Savola wrote:
What about people who have zero intention to run either IPv4 or DHCP?
the part of the document that describes how to update the forward zone may
be applied to IPv6 as well as IPv4 (although the actual scripting needed
is left as an exercise for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith == Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
we are hoping that this exercise will do the same for dynamic dns
update with dhcp.
Keith I guess my question is how valuable this is. As far as I can tell,
Keith stable DNS names are of
Again, we've had this discussion again and again - definitions of stable
vary from anything less than a month is useless, to 20 minutes is enough.
What's this we stuff?
I don't ever recall anybody bothering to ask application developers whether
it was okay for DHCP servers (much less
: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Keith == Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
we are hoping that this exercise will do the same for dynamic dns
update with dhcp.
Keith I guess my question is how valuable this is. As far as I can
tell,
Keith
22 matches
Mail list logo
