On Jan 8, 2006, at 2:24 AM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
I'd suggest requiring that the image format be GIF,
since it's simple, stable, well documented, widely supported in both
freeware and commercial software,
and the patents have expired.
Actually that is not quite right YET.
There are patents
I'd suggest requiring that the image format be GIF,
since it's simple, stable, well documented, widely supported in both
freeware and commercial software,
and the patents have expired.
Actually that is not quite right YET.
There are patents relating to the compression used in GIF
that only
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On mandag, januar 02, 2006 18:10:15 +0200 Yaakov Stein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I am sure about is
that
consensus on this list is for keeping everything exactly as it is.
I'm pretty sure there's no such consensus.
I do, however, see a
Brian - you've hit on an important point here. It strikes me that the
process for defining our own document standards has no fundamental
differences from the process for defining any other standard. Why shouldn't
this archival document standard be developed and adopted as a Standard in
the same
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On mandag, januar 02, 2006 18:10:15 +0200 Yaakov Stein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I am sure about is
that
consensus on this list is for keeping everything exactly as it is.
I'm pretty sure there's no such
