Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts

At 11:38 AM +0200 10/23/10, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >On 10/23/2010 11:27 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>I thought that's what we have Atom feeds for? (at >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/...) > >There isn't an atom feed for draft*-foo*-*, only for specific documents/urls. >Right? (Again, hoping th

Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts

At 10:30 PM -0700 10/22/10, Fred Baker wrote: >Interesting draft, Paul. So I gather this is something like - enable a >registered user to maintain one or more "interest lists" and to do things >based on them. Indeed. Could we move this thread over to the mailing list that was set up for the pro

Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts

On 10/23/2010 11:27 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: I thought that's what we have Atom feeds for? (at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/...) There isn't an atom feed for draft*-foo*-*, only for specific documents/urls. Right? Arnt ___ Ietf mailing list Ie

Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts

On 23.10.2010 07:30, Fred Baker wrote: ... Let me throw out an idea. You may be familiar with http://changedetect.com; if you aren't, take a look. What it does is poll http and https sites and send you an email when they change. It's really useful for looking at things like https://datatracker

Re: Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts

On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. There is a new draft that may be of interest to many people > in the IETF: > . The > abstract is: > > The document gives a set of requirements for extendi

Extending the Datatracker to display user-specific lists of drafts

Greetings again. There is a new draft that may be of interest to many people in the IETF: . The abstract is: The document gives a set of requirements for extending the IETF Datatracker to give individual IETF community m