Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Roy Arends
On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 31 lines which said: Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do

Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 31 lines which said: Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it. Is it to test the future procedure that RFC 4390

[Inquiry #98454] Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:10:14PM +, Roy Arends [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 24 lines which said: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt Forbidden ... http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390 It works again now (someone probably fixed it). Nothing to do with the URL, both URL were and

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Daniel Brown
On Dec 14, 2007 9:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that there is work going on today with the transfer of services from NSS to AMS, and I suspect that these errors may be connected to this. It may be, but according to Ray Pelletier (Administrative Director), the DNS

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Joe Baptista
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:17:15PM -0500, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 31 lines which said: Another possible remedy might be to withdraw the RFC. This remedy is not as attractive because there is no procedure to do it. Is it to test

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Bob Braden
* * http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390 * Or the RFC Editor web site works: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4390 since the RFC Editor's archive is in fact primary. RFC Editor * ___ * Ietf mailing list * Ietf@ietf.org *

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Russ Housley
This URL works for me ... At 08:34 AM 12/14/2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4390.txt ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Forbidden RFC (Was: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

2007-12-14 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:07:44PM -0500, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 4 lines which said: This URL works for me ... Yes, it has been fixed in the mean time. ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org