On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:35:33PM -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> At 02:55 PM 09/16/2005, Bill Manning wrote:
> >sorry, the I-D has no information as to where this should be discussed...
> >so:
>
> Umm, from the file name I would have thought V6OPS is the intended venue to
> discuss it
Hi Bill,
At 02:55 PM 09/16/2005, Bill Manning wrote:
sorry, the I-D has no information as to where this should be discussed... so:
Umm, from the file name I would have thought V6OPS is the intended venue to
discuss it.
draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-00.txt
Suggesting moving any
sorry, the I-D has no information as to where this should be discussed... so:
i am convinced that the IETF has no business telling me what routes i may or may not
accept from or send to my peers, with the exception of prefixes of undefined BEHAVIOUR,
much like the IPv4 class "E" space. That said,
