RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-27 Thread Bharat Joshi
...@nostrum.com] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:45 AM To: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption@tools.ietf.org Cc: gen-...@ietf.org Review Team; ietf@ietf.org List Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-21 Thread Ben Campbell
Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-21 Thread Ben Campbell
On Dec 21, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote: On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:48 AM, RAMAKRISHNADTV ramakrishna...@infosys.com wrote: As Ted mentioned, our draft only proposes a new sub-option for relay-agent option which was originally created as part of RFC3046. So, the

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-21 Thread Ben Campbell
On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote: On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote: As I responded separately to Ramakrishna, is the SHOULD use 4030 language a new requirement specific to this draft? Or is it just describing requirements

RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-21 Thread RAMAKRISHNADTV
-...@ietf.org Review Team; ietf@ietf.org List Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-21 Thread Ted Lemon
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:48 AM, RAMAKRISHNADTV ramakrishna...@infosys.com wrote: As Ted mentioned, our draft only proposes a new sub-option for relay-agent option which was originally created as part of RFC3046. So, the security considerations for RFC3046 apply to our draft as well. RFC3046

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-21 Thread Ted Lemon
On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote: As I responded separately to Ramakrishna, is the SHOULD use 4030 language a new requirement specific to this draft? Or is it just describing requirements in 3046 or elsewhere? I suppose the authors should really answer this,

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11

2012-12-19 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11