Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08

2013-09-11 Thread Jari Arkko
@tools.ietf.org; ietf; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Hi Roni, sorry again for the delay. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Roni Even ron.even@gmail.com wrote: I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were

Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08

2013-09-07 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi Roni, sorry again for the delay. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Roni Even ron.even@gmail.com wrote: I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were not addressed and I did not see any response. So I am resending my previous review As for making it a standard

RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08

2013-09-07 Thread Roni Even
...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 September, 2013 10:41 AM To: Roni Even Cc: draft-ietf-repute-model@tools.ietf.org; ietf; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08 Hi Roni, sorry again for the delay. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Roni Even ron.even

Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08

2013-08-31 Thread Roni Even
I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were not addressed and I did not see any response. So I am resending my previous review As for making it a standard track document, I am not sure since it looks to me as an overview and not standard. And there is no normative language

Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08

2013-08-31 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi Roni, I didn't see your previous review for some reason. I can't respond in full now as I'm about to travel, but I will over the long weekend (unless Andrew gets to it first). Thanks, -MSK On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Roni Even ron.even@gmail.com wrote: I was asked to review