responsibilities for acting as a
trustee for IETF-owned IP. There needs to be a specific task added to the
IAOC responsibilities for this purpose. Specifically, the following words
should be added to the list of IAOC responsibilities: Serve as Trustee
for IETF assets including, without limitation, intellectual
] wrote:
I continue to remain concerned that the BCP is not flexible enough to
allow the IAOC to assume administrative responsibilities for acting as a
trustee for IETF-owned IP. There needs to be a specific task added to the
IAOC responsibilities for this purpose. Specifically, the following words
At 11:57 PM 02/06/05 -0500, Robert Kahn wrote:
If you think there is a concern about liability for the IAOC, then you
should have similar concerns about the IETF leaderhship, since they would
also need coverage for their activities.
Thanks for pointing that out, Bob. They have indeed had such
I continue to remain concerned that the BCP is not flexible enough to allow
the IAOC to assume administrative responsibilities for acting as a trustee
for IETF-owned IP. There needs to be a specific task added to the IAOC
responsibilities for this purpose. Specifically, the following words
concerned that the BCP is not flexible enough to
allow the IAOC to assume administrative responsibilities for acting as a
trustee for IETF-owned IP. There needs to be a specific task added to the
IAOC responsibilities for this purpose. Specifically, the following words
should be added to the list of IAOC
for IETF-owned IP. There needs to be a specific task added to the
IAOC responsibilities for this purpose. Specifically, the following words
should be added to the list of IAOC responsibilities: Serve as Trustee
for IETF assets including, without limitation, intellectual property and
domain names
responsibilities for acting as a
trustee for IETF-owned IP. There needs to be a specific task added to the
IAOC responsibilities for this purpose. Specifically, the following words
should be added to the list of IAOC responsibilities: Serve as Trustee
for IETF assets including, without limitation
Bob, I appreciate your interest in working with the IETF to establish
the IASA. I also appreciate your interest in improving the BCP.
I have been disappointed that you have been sending revised comments
on the IPR issue over the last two weeks. However you have not been
engaging in a discussion
Hi, Bob. It was pointed out to me privately that my message could be
misinterpreted and that it might come across as if I'm not interested
in listening to and evaluating proposals for change. That's certainly
not my intent so let me take a step back and explain what I was trying
to do.
I
do most, if not all, of the functions you
outline below, without any modification to the current (-05) version of the
BCP draft.
Specifically, in order to
enable the IAOC to assume such trust responsibility, it is important to
add this task to the list of IAOC responsibilities in the draft IASA
The following text largely tracks the message I posted to the IETF list
on Tuesday afternoon, but it differs primarily in that the set of
proposed additional IAOC Responsibilities (at the end of the message)
have been tightened up as well as expanded based on numerous comments
that I've received
, such
responsibilities should be added to the list in the draft IASA (proposed
BCP 04), section 3.2 as follows:
Proposed Additions IAOC Responsibilities:
Serve as Trustees for IETF related intellectual property, as
appropriate, where such assets are placed in trust for the IETF, and
coordinate with the IESG
Hi Bob -
Since I examined some of the issues you raise in some depth as part of
my consulting engagement, I thought I could provide some useful background
on some of the points you raise.
For those who are interested, I looked at these issues in two reports:
13 matches
Mail list logo
