On 3/19/2013 1:20 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
Merely to offer an example notation:
Sean Turner mentioned that a year ago someone asked him how to become
a WG chair. Asking is the first step! He thinks that if people want to
actively participate, they need to volunteer to write drafts etc.
On 3/18/2013 1:54 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-iesg-opsplenary
Please review and comment.
The difference between a 'venting' session and a 'working' session is
that the latter produces action items that actually produce further...
action.
Hi Dave,
At 08:01 19-03-2013, Dave Crocker wrote:
The difference between a 'venting' session and a 'working' session
is that the latter produces action items that actually produce
further... action.
Yes.
For the most part, the open microphone portion of plenaries tends to
serve merely as
Obviously not part of the basic note-taking effort, but I suggest that
IETF management groups explicitly consider the task of augmenting the notes
with published action items they are taking from the sessions.
Along that line, I'll note the notes from the App Area chairs meeting,
which we've
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-iesg-opsplenary
Please review and comment.
Russ
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-iesg-opsplenary
Please review and comment.
-
Lorenzo Colitti was wondering what problem we are trying to solve: He
looked at the IESG and they all look the same as the people in the
audience. Is the
