Simon Josefsson wrote:
I consider the inability to include immutable text in software
released under the GPL a bug in the GPL.
Nobody forces you to use the GPL, so if you perceive a problem I suggest
to use another license for your program. However, the IETF should not
prevent
This is getting off-topic, and seems like typical FAQ material, but I'll
reply briefly. I suggest using, e.g., discuss...@fsfeurope.org to get
other people's interpretations. If you want a more authoritative
answer, talk to licens...@gnu.org.
Harald Alvestrand har...@alvestrand.no writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
This is getting off-topic, and seems like typical FAQ material, but I'll
reply briefly. I suggest using, e.g., discuss...@fsfeurope.org to get
other people's interpretations. If you want a more authoritative
answer, talk to licens...@gnu.org.
2 - The words of the
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Generally, however, I think this question is very different from where
this thread started. It started, as far as I consider, with Stephan
suggesting that free software authors publish free (as in licensed
under a free software license) standards in the IETF. That is
pasi.ero...@nokia.com writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Generally, however, I think this question is very different from where
this thread started. It started, as far as I consider, with Stephan
suggesting that free software authors publish free (as in licensed
under a free software license)
Harald Alvestrand wrote:
Simon,
the example is at http://counter.li.org/scripts/machine-update. Take a
look.
There is a single file that contains both the program source and the GPL.
I want to release this under the GPL.
Now, I have three possible interpretations:
1 - The words of the
