On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> Having to choose between /60 and /48 would be much better than having
> to choose between /64 and bigger in general, as it removes the "will
> I ever need a second subnet" consideration, the average allocation
> size g
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 3-jun-2006, at 5:33, Steven Blake wrote:
>
> >I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
> >ratios > 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making
> >address
> >allocations to larger p
On 3-jun-2006, at 5:33, Steven Blake wrote:
I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
ratios > 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making
address
allocations to larger providers). I believe that:
(1) this would not solve a real problem,
A little
I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
ratios > 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making address
allocations to larger providers). I believe that:
(1) this would not solve a real problem,
(2) it is risky to infer too much from existing network design
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 10:39 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
> At 01:33 PM 3/06/2006, Steven Blake wrote:
> >I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
> >ratios > 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making address
> >allocations to larger providers).
>
>
> This
At 02:52 PM 4/06/2006, Steven Blake wrote:
> Your representation as to the document's conclusions is simply not
> supported by the document itself.
Geoff,
I don't understand why you think my paraphrase of your document's
conclusions (including the quoted text above) is unfair or inaccurate.
I
At 01:33 PM 3/06/2006, Steven Blake wrote:
I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
ratios > 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making address
allocations to larger providers).
This is a topic of interest both to the IETF and to regional addressing
p