Hi Geoff,
Brian reminded me of your Last Call comment, which I saw and then
overlooked. I think I meant to say "No experimental addresses are
assigned", where you took exception to saying "...defined".
Do you find the following text sensible?
3.4.1. IPv6 Unicast Addresses
[RFC2928] de
At 06:29 AM 2/02/2006, The IESG wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
>following document:
>
>- 'Experimental Values In IPv4, IPv6, ICMPv4, ICMPv6, UDP and TCP Headers '
>as a Proposed Standard
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few
