On 28/11/2011 23:42, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'URI Template'
draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
Discussion ietf@ietf.org;
draft-gregorio-uritempl...@tools.ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07.txt (URI Template)
On 03/12/2011, at 10:41 PM, t.petch wrote:
Rather, I would insert
'reserved and unreserved are formally defined
On 03/12/2011, at 10:41 PM, t.petch wrote:
Rather, I would insert
'reserved and unreserved are formally defined in section 1.5 using the same
definitions as appear in [RFC3986]'
after the first paragraph of 1.2.
In SVN.
Cheers,
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
:51 AM
To: Mark Nottingham
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07.txt (URI Template)
The examples are rather complicated. If I have a month to spare, I
will work my way through them by which time, were I to find anything,
doubtless it would
- Original Message -
From: Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net
To: t.petch daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: IETF Discussion ietf@ietf.org;
draft-gregorio-uritempl...@tools.ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 1:47 AM
On 01/12/2011, at 9:50 PM, t.petch wrote:
2.3
Is undefined formally defined?
On 01/12/2011, at 9:50 PM, t.petch wrote:
2.3
Is undefined formally defined? This section suggests that 'undef' or 'null',
inter alia, may be used to undefine a variable while 3.2 uses 'null'. I see
no
more formal definition of how to undefine a variable, as opposed to it having
a
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
t.petch
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:51 AM
To: Mark Nottingham
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07.txt (URI Template)
The examples are rather
On 3 December 2011 01:47, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
1.2
worth pointing out that 'reserved' and 'unreserved' are formally
defined in 1.5, to stop people reaching for RFC3986.
If this is an issue, I'd actually prefer to place the notational
conventions section higher in the
On 30 November 2011 00:44, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
Not sure what you're saying here; the URI escape syntax is % HEXDIG HEXDIG.
ACK, sorry for the confusion, I used the same ABNF hex. constructs as in
the literals section for the square brackets.
If the literal character [ occurs
2.3
Is undefined formally defined? This section suggests that 'undef' or 'null',
inter alia, may be used to undefine a variable while 3.2 uses 'null'. I see no
more formal definition of how to undefine a variable, as opposed to it having a
value or having an empty value.
1.2
worth pointing out
Hi, that's an important and good draft. Some editorial nits:
In section 2.1 you use CTL, DQUOTE, and SP in a comment.
Please add these terms to the ABNF imports in section 1.5.
In section 1.3 you mention WSDL, WADL and OpenSearch.
Please add informative references and expand the acronyms.
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the feedback. Responses below.
On 29/11/2011, at 8:23 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Hi, that's an important and good draft. Some editorial nits:
In section 2.1 you use CTL, DQUOTE, and SP in a comment.
Please add these terms to the ABNF imports in section 1.5.
I'm -0 on
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'URI Template'
draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send
13 matches
Mail list logo
