- Original Message -
From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
To: t.petch daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; Dave CROCKER dcroc...@bbiw.net; Mark Nottingham
m...@mnot.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:19 PM
On 3/13/12 3:37 AM, t.petch wrote:
I am surprised at the lack of
On 3/16/12 4:00 AM, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
To: t.petch daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; Dave CROCKER dcroc...@bbiw.net; Mark Nottingham
m...@mnot.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:19 PM
On 3/13/12 3:37 AM, t.petch
I am surprised at the lack of comment on this I-D on its use of terminology. I
have seen and learnt from many discussions on this list that have teased out
what concept it is we are really talking about (e.g. identity v identifier) and
this I-D seems somewhat weak in that regard.
Thus the
On 3/13/12 3:37 AM, t.petch wrote:
I am surprised at the lack of comment on this I-D on its use of terminology.
I
have seen and learnt from many discussions on this list that have teased out
what concept it is we are really talking about (e.g. identity v identifier)
and
this I-D seems
On 3/13/12 4:19 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/13/12 3:37 AM, t.petch wrote:
I am surprised at the lack of comment on this I-D on its use of terminology.
I
have seen and learnt from many discussions on this list that have teased out
what concept it is we are really talking about (e.g.
