Reading through the document I fail to see the clearly stated restriction that
this is not to be used between the emergency caller's UA and the VSP/ASP's
network (for VSP/ASP routed calls) or between the UA and the PSAP (for directly
routed calls).
I was in the believe that the scope is
If you insist on that scope
I was in the believe that the scope is restricted only to PSAP-to-first
Responder, and PSAP-to-PSAP communication.
Then you can throw it away.
I certainly don't see it being used by an emergency calling UA, but in a 3GPP
like solution to emergency calling, there
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'IANA Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for
Local Emergency Communications'
draft-polk-local-emergency-rph-namespace-01.txt as a Proposed
Standard
The IESG plans to
