Re: Last call of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19

2013-08-21 Thread S Moonesamy
Hi Patrik, At 11:58 20-08-2013, Patrik Fältström wrote: As the bottle is opened, I hereby state my objection to Section 3.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19 for the reasons explained below. I do agree (as stated below) that the section of RFC 4408 that specify how to use both SPF and TXT

Last call of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19

2013-08-20 Thread Patrik Fältström
As the bottle is opened, I hereby state my objection to Section 3.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19 for the reasons explained below. I do agree (as stated below) that the section of RFC 4408 that specify how to use both SPF and TXT resource record types include an error as it does not lead to