Hi SM
my answer to your reply,
On 5/27/13, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
Hi Abdussalam,
At 16:38 26-05-2013, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
I think they SHOULD have, and all of us should do the same, because
IETF will expand and become stronger by increasing participants from
ALL Internet community
I support to try the new meeting sites such as South America or Africa.
Jiankang Yao
From: Abdussalam Baryun
Date: 2013-05-27 07:38
To: SM
CC: ietf; dcrocker
Subject: Re: More participation from under-represented regions (was: IETF
Meeting in South America)
I support to add the new region
Hi Abdussalam,
At 16:38 26-05-2013, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
I think they SHOULD have, and all of us should do the same, because
IETF will expand and become stronger by increasing participants from
ALL Internet community regions. The answers also based on IETF vesion.
The question was about
At 09:42 26-05-2013, Dave Crocker wrote:
I like visiting South America. But IETF meetings do not have
tourism as a goal. So yes, I'm sure those who go will enjoy the
city; but again, that's not stated purpose of choosing venues.
Over a year ago the IAOC [was] pleased to announce the Return
I support to add the new region, hoping in future Africa gets its
chance. IMO, I thought about it from another point of view. After a
long time of having IETF meetings mostly in one region (as history of
North America region gaining most meetings), the result of that was
that IETF participants are
