--At 11:37 AM -0500 1/26/05, John C Klensin wrote:
Of course, if Neustar agrees to whatever provisions are in the
BCP, and whatever details about those provisions that the IAOC
specifies, and is able to do so --which Harald's note indicates
they are prepared to do-- then this should not be an
John C Klensin wrote:
[many things, including]
(1) The note indicates that the Transition Team is favorably
inclined to consider a proposal from NeuStar for continuing
Secretariat services Does that language imply that the
Transition Team believes that it has the authority to accept
such a
--On Wednesday, 26 January, 2005 11:38 +0100 Brian E Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John C Klensin wrote:
[many things, including]
(1) The note indicates that the Transition Team is favorably
inclined to consider a proposal from NeuStar for continuing
Secretariat services Does
John C Klensin suggested as one option:
* Fix the BCP to accommodate this case, i.e., to give
the IAOC the authority to accept unsolicited,
sole-source proposals for outsourced operations if that
seems appropriate to them, even if those proposals do
not
At 10:13 AM -0500 1/26/05, John C Klensin wrote:
Hi John,
The situation you fear doesn't change at all. The draft doesn't
give the IAOC any authority to accept an unsolicited proposal in
the absence of an IAD-created, IAOC-approved, RFP and at least
the potential for competitive proposals against
John writes:
... snip a lot ..
I'd rather either
* Fix the BCP to accommodate this case, i.e., to give
the IAOC the authority to accept unsolicited,
sole-source proposals for outsourced operations if that
seems appropriate to them, even if those proposals do
Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
...
All we need to do is that as soon as we have IASA in place (we
still need to approve the BCP first) that IASA then starts
to prepare for RFPs and such and then the process can start.
During that process, we are still subject to whatever
CNRI/Foretec/Neustar do, are
All we need to do is that as soon as we have IASA in place (we
still need to approve the BCP first) that IASA then starts
to prepare for RFPs and such and then the process can start.
the prepare for RFPs seems futile (or at least *very* premature)
if NeuStar is to get a N-year
--On Wednesday, 26 January, 2005 11:02 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:13 AM -0500 1/26/05, John C Klensin wrote:
Hi John,
The situation you fear doesn't change at all. The draft
doesn't give the IAOC any authority to accept an unsolicited
proposal in the
Scott writes
All we need to do is that as soon as we have IASA in place (we
still need to approve the BCP first) that IASA then starts
to prepare for RFPs and such and then the process can start.
the prepare for RFPs seems futile (or at least *very* premature)
if NeuStar is to get a
--On Wednesday, 26 January, 2005 18:02 +0100 Wijnen, Bert
(Bert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott writes
All we need to do is that as soon as we have IASA in place
(we still need to approve the BCP first) that IASA then
starts to prepare for RFPs and such and then the process
can
--On Wednesday, 26 January, 2005 17:04 +0100 Wijnen, Bert
(Bert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John writes:
... snip a lot ..
I'd rather either
* Fix the BCP to accommodate this case, i.e., to give
the IAOC the authority to accept unsolicited,
sole-source proposals for
--On Wednesday, 26 January, 2005 11:02 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
I just went back and looked at the text, and it appears, to my
chagrin, that after weeks of discussion about preferred
outsourcing and RFP-based processes, we have improved the
language sufficiently to not prevent, even in principle,
Hi John,
At 12:10 PM -0500 1/26/05, John C Klensin wrote:
Recognizing the textual problem that Margaret identified and
moving back to intent, sooner or later the IAD and IAOC need to
decide whether or not to issue one or more competitive RFPs for
some or all of the secretariat functions. My
I believe the scenarios you are outlining are certainly
possible. I don't (personally) believe that we can write
rules or process steps to make them impossible. I also
am concsiously saying possible without any prejudice
about likelihood. That is -- I have no opinion about
the likelihood of
--On onsdag, januar 26, 2005 12:30:13 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, 26 January, 2005 11:02 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
I just went back and looked at the text, and it appears, to my
chagrin, that after weeks of discussion about preferred
outsourcing and
16 matches
Mail list logo
