On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
And don't lets forget that plenty of people have proposed schemes that WGs
have turned down and then been proven right years later.
If people are just saying what everyone else is saying here then they are not
C: does my appeal look more like the club of 3, or the club of 11?
I think there's a new club of one.
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
On 07/03/2013 05:20 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
C: does my appeal look more like the club of 3, or the club of 11?
I think there's a new club of one.
Wait, so now instead of voting we're using clubs? I think I need to pay
more attention to this thread ...
Yeah, but we don't actually count the clubs, so it's okay.
