No. You can trace back to the fact that the signed data was at the same
^
a hash of
place as the private key, at the same time.
I've seen people *who operate CAs* lose sight of the fact that it's
the hash
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 03:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:17:29 +1200, Franck Martin said:
Note that you can set your exchange server to convert s/mime messages
automatically... On my exchange 5.5 in the Internet connector there is an
This is, of course, assuming
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:38:50 +1200, Franck Martin said:
The question of a global PKI is to remove anonymity. You can trace back
to a real person (legal person) from the certificate. Who can offer
No. You can trace back to the fact that the signed data was at the same
place as the private key,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:35:52 CST, Matt Crawford said:
The question of a global PKI is to remove anonymity. You can trace back
to a real person (legal person) from the certificate. Who can offer
No. You can trace back to the fact that the signed data was at the same
Title: RE: [isdf] RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
I agree with you, I found many more applications that
do not support s/mime cf SSL-Certificates HOWTO on www.tldp.org.
However, you can sign messages in s/mime clear text,
which works the same as PGP by encapsulating the message in clear inside
Title: Message
As
this thread is becoming more and more technical, may I suggest to limit it from
now on to the IETF list and then to stop cc:ing the ISDF
list...
-Original Message-From: Franck Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I agree with you, I found many more
F == Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
F ...Anyone who sends me e-mail can be identified. Anything I
F send can be traced to me. People wouldn't be forced to
F participate, but if they remain anonymous, I might choose to
F block them. I certainly wouldn't accept file
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:17:29 +1200, Franck Martin said:
Note that you can set your exchange server to convert s/mime messages
automatically... On my exchange 5.5 in the Internet connector there is an
This is, of course, assuming you are willing or able to use an exchange server.
Not all the
Murphy [mailto:garym;canada.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:19
To: Franck Martin
Cc: 'TOMSON ERIC'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [isdf] RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Isn't that PGP?
___
Isdf mailing list
[EMAIL
Title: RE: [isdf] RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
MS promises S/MIME support in their next release, which would be Dec or Mar or Jun or... Currently, Outlook Web Access doesn't know S/MIME, so certificate use is not possible. It is possible to read a signed email and to retrieve the attachment
At 08:40 AM 10/22/2002 -0600, Vernon Schryver wrote:
Again, other big organizations (specifically including Cisco) are not
above embracing-and-extending out of ignorance, provincialism, and
failures to bother to do interoperability testing (possible causes of
the Microsoft PPP hassles) if not
11 matches
Mail list logo
