--On 20. mars 2007 09:35 -0700 Silvano Gai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5) Introduction - Bridging limitation. The first paragraph refers to
Ethernet networks used without Spanning Tree. This is irrelevant, since
Spanning Tree is always deployed in conjunction with Ethernet. The
correct contrast
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 20. mars 2007 09:35 -0700 Silvano Gai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5) Introduction - Bridging limitation. The first paragraph refers to
Ethernet networks used without Spanning Tree. This is irrelevant, since
Spanning Tree is always
Harald,
As it was originally chartered, the TRILL working group allowed
scope for definition of TRILL bridges that could be cheaply produced,
modulo the inclusion of a ink-state routing protocol as a complicating
factor. It is not clear at this point that this has changed.
This document has some issues that need to be corrected before it can
pass an IESG last call.
In order of importance:
1) The document equates Ethernet with IEEE 802 and this is clearly
incorrect, since IEEE 802 includes also technologies like Token Ring,
DQDB, Wireless that are clearly outside
