On 05/15/2013 12:25 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
I don't think the IETF needs to be in the profile/resume
business. There are plenty of other places that do a fine job already.
What I do think the IETF should do is *require* that participants
identify themselves. That means knowing who they are (a
From: Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com
What I do think the IETF should do is *require* that participants
identify themselves. That means knowing who they are (a name and email
contact) and an affiliation. For 80% of the participants, this info is
not very hard to figure out (see below). But
I don't think the IETF needs to be in the profile/resume
business. There are plenty of other places that do a fine job already.
What I do think the IETF should do is *require* that participants
identify themselves. That means knowing who they are (a name and email
contact) and an affiliation. For
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 18:25 +0200 Thomas Narten
nar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I don't think the IETF needs to be in the profile/resume
business. There are plenty of other places that do a fine job
already.
What I do think the IETF should do is *require* that
participants identify
John C Klensin john dash ietf at jck dot com wrote:
I think it is all very well to ask for affiliations in principle
and, also in principle, I agree that it is a good idea. But, in
practice, I think there are a lot of clarifications and other
changes that would be required and that might or
Subject: Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF
process]
John C Klensin john dash ietf at jck dot com wrote:
I think it is all very well to ask for affiliations in principle
and, also in principle, I agree that it is a good idea. But, in
practice, I think
Hi John.
I agree there are a number of specific cases where there is no
simple/obvious way to handle. I'd be OK with something fairly simple
as unaffiliated or consultant or something more nuanced. But I'd
like to think those are edge cases (but could of course be wrong in
how common they are). I
On 05/15/2013 07:38 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
So, what would you have me (and others like me) put on
registration forms so that I'm not part of that undifferentiated
180 names?
How about 7 densely worded paragraphs?
Sorry, couldn't resist:-)
S.
In all earnestness I don't think a resume will be necessary at all :).
--
Regards,
Edwin A. Opare
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
On 05/15/2013 07:38 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
So, what would you have me (and others like me) put on
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 14:28 -0700 Doug Ewell
d...@ewellic.org wrote:
...
I did this because
the WG at the time included a malicious contributor who had
already contacted the HR department of another contributor's
employer, asking them to professionally discipline the
employee,
--On Friday, May 03, 2013 18:10 -0400 Hector Santos
hsan...@isdg.net wrote:
May I suggest that the IETF produce a web site for gathering
IETF participants profiles and even resumes. It can have a
questionnaire to extract the valuable information that will
help maximize the IETF/IESG
* Hector Santos wrote:
May I suggest that the IETF produce a web site for gathering IETF
participants profiles and even resumes. It can have a questionnaire to
extract the valuable information that will help maximize the IETF/IESG
efforts. The Business Information (BI) can then be leveraged
12 matches
Mail list logo
