Peter Deutsch wrote:
>
> g'day,
>
> "Michael B. Bellopede" wrote:
> ...
> > Regardless of what occurs at higher layers, there is still the problem of
> > changing the source address in an IP packet which occurs at the network(IP)
> > layer.
>
> The Content Services Business Unit of Cisco (Fai
Hi Patrik,
Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
> At 17.29 -0700 2000-04-07, Peter Deutsch wrote:
> > LD is intended to sit in front of a cluster of
> >cache engines containing similar data, performing automatic
> >distribution of incoming requests among the multiple caches. It does
> >this by intercepting
At 17.29 -0700 2000-04-07, Peter Deutsch wrote:
> LD is intended to sit in front of a cluster of
>cache engines containing similar data, performing automatic
>distribution of incoming requests among the multiple caches. It does
>this by intercepting the incoming IP packets intended for a specific
g'day,
"Michael B. Bellopede" wrote:
...
> Regardless of what occurs at higher layers, there is still the problem of
> changing the source address in an IP packet which occurs at the network(IP)
> layer.
The Content Services Business Unit of Cisco (Fair Disclosure time -
that's my employer and
Dennis-
That is not a fair statement to make to an end-user. My end-users have no
say about what client software, services, or ISP solutions provided.
-Michael B. Bellopede
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leslie Daigle wrote:
>
> As an end-user, I can be as aware as I like about the security issues,
> bu
>>
>> 1. an Internet service provider which deliberately intercepts traffic
>> (say, an IP packet) which was intended for one address or service,
>> and delivers it to another address or service (say that of an
interception
>> proxy) may be misrepresenting the service it provides (it's not really
