is required at the application
level. That is the whole point of using the SOAP stack for Web Services.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:05 PM
To: Robert Sayre
Cc: IETF discussion list
Subject: Re: with merit?
Robert
OK. I want to write a document that makes MTI a non-requirement for
HTTP1.1-based protocols, because I believe that is the consensus in the
HTTP community. How do I get that done?
IMHO, you need IETF-wide consensus for this, not just consensus within
the HTTP community, because your proposal
Robert == Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On 10/17/06, Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Can an appeal be rejected with merit?
Yes. I think Robert's recent appeal was rejected that way.
Robert I don't feel that way. I did wait a long time for a
Sam Hartman wrote:
Robert == Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On 10/17/06, Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Can an appeal be rejected with merit?
Yes. I think Robert's recent appeal was rejected that way.
Robert I don't feel that
Robert == Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert OK. I want to write a document that makes MTI a
Robert non-requirement for HTTP1.1-based protocols, because I
Robert believe that is the consensus in the HTTP community. How
Robert do I get that done?
You start by writing a
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:29:07 -0400, Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK. I want to write a document that makes MTI a non-requirement for
HTTP1.1-based protocols, because I believe that is the consensus in the
HTTP community. How do I get that done?
Are you trying to change general
