Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-17 Thread Eliot Lear
Brian E Carpenter wrote: Initial contract with who? The only fair bidding process I know is one in which potential bidders are sought via a very widespread and relatively low cost RFI, followed by a targetted and relatively high cost RFP. IMHO the risk of not having an RFI is that the bids

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-16 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Eliot Lear wrote: John C Klensin wrote: How does one fix later a contract, presumably a multi-year one, if we get what we ask for and then discover that we don't like it? By specifying flexible terms in the initial contract. Initial contract with who? The only fair bidding process I

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-14 Thread Eliot Lear
IMHO IASA issung an RFI strikes me as dallying. Let's not. If we get it wrong we fix it later. Same with process changes as a result of further action on the part of this organization. Eliot ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-14 Thread John C Klensin
--On Friday, 14 April, 2006 13:33 +0200 Eliot Lear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO IASA issung an RFI strikes me as dallying. Let's not. If we get it wrong we fix it later. Same with process changes as a result of further action on the part of this organization. How does one fix later a

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-14 Thread Eliot Lear
John C Klensin wrote: How does one fix later a contract, presumably a multi-year one, if we get what we ask for and then discover that we don't like it? By specifying flexible terms in the initial contract. Eliot ___ Ietf mailing list

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-13 Thread John C Klensin
Leslie, IAB, and others, Three observations on the schedule (included below for convenience), based on the events of the last month... (1) The initial STRAW PROPOSAL draft of the new RFC Editor charter, in your email of 16 March, says, in part,... The purpose of this straw proposal is to

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-03-18 Thread Jari Arkko
Hi Leslie, and thanks for working on this. I also believe that this process is important and beneficial for everyone who either uses or produces (IETF, IAB, IRTF, individuals) RFCs. Overall, the timeline looks fine. I have a few comments and questions on it, however: . developing

RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-03-16 Thread Leslie Daigle
The IAB and IAOC have put together the following proposed plan for clarifying the RFC Editor function and running through a contract review process this year. The key pieces of this proposed process are: . getting agreement on a basic RFC Editor charter . completing TechSpec to