, David
Cc: Sam Hartman; hous...@vigilsec.com; tim.p...@nist.gov; Dacheng Zhang
(zhangdach...@huawei.com); General Area Review Team (gen-...@ietf.org);
k...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08
Black, == Black, David david.bl
: hous...@vigilsec.com; tim.p...@nist.gov; Dacheng Zhang
(zhangdach...@huawei.com); General Area Review Team (gen-...@ietf.org);
k...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08
David, as we mentioned in the IESG thread, we seem to have
Zhang
(zhangdach...@huawei.com); General Area Review Team (gen-...@ietf.org);
k...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08
David, as we mentioned in the IESG thread, we seem to have dropped the
response to your comments about IANA
Black, == Black, David david.bl...@emc.com writes:
Black, done. IMHO, we really should be setting a bar that says
Black, that this sort of IETF imprimatur of approval of a crypto
Black, algorithm actually means something.
Something got manged there.
I agree that publishing a
Black, == Black, David david.bl...@emc.com writes:
Black, done. IMHO, we really should be setting a bar that says
Black, that this sort of IETF imprimatur of approval of a crypto
Black, algorithm actually means something.
Something got manged there.
I agree that publishing a
David, as we mentioned in the IESG thread, we seem to have dropped the
response to your comments about IANA actions.
WG:
From the genart review:
[9] I suggest Expert Review for the new IANA registries, not just
First Come First Served, so that someone with a security clue can
check that the
