Hi,
As co-editor of this document, I didn't expect the acknowledgement issue can
result in such long discussion.
I have to repeat that, the decision regarding the acknowledgment section is
made following the instructions from rfc 5378 and rfc 2026.
We think the facts are:
o AB
AB,
This may surprise you, but not everyone cares what you think.
John
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Routing Area AD,
I had many comments/issues regarding your area always addressed to you
and including this
Dear Routing Area AD,
I had many comments/issues regarding your area always addressed to you
and including this issue which I hope my all comments (past/present)
will help to make better practice/procedural progresses in this IETF
Area.
I am sorry also to any one receiving this email but I send
Hi,
It falls to me to make a call on this issue before the document moves on.
Abdussalam has complained that he has not been acknowledged and has objected to
the current text in section 8.
The authors have responded on the MANET list
We believe that only comments that lead to significant
On 6/6/13, Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
It falls to me to make a call on this issue before the document moves on.
Abdussalam has complained that he has not been acknowledged and has objected
to
the current text in section 8.
The authors have responded on the MANET list
We
Sorry to everyone for the noise this thread is creating.
Multiple questions that I have to answer.
It falls to me to make a call on this issue before the document moves on.
Abdussalam has complained that he has not been acknowledged and has
objected to the current text in section 8.
The
