Timur Shemsedinov wrote:
Here question, whether is necessary to have two
realizations of the RPC using XML?
Again, it's not up to the IETF; XML-RPC already exists. And, in fact,
it predates SOAP.
--
/===\
|John Stracke |[EMAIL
EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Ward Harold/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
pi.kiev.ua> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Last Call: Using XML-RPC
in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Timur Shemsedinov wrote:
>1. How it can work in local networks if IANA is not accessible and
>profiles can be received neither from the client nor from the server
>of such network? Or they are placed locally, if so why URL refers to
>iana.org ?
>
It's not used as a URL; it's used as a URI. You d
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-harold-beep-xmlrpc-00.txt
There are some questions concerning xmlrpc and some,
most probably, even beep.
1. How it can work in local networks if IANA is not accessible and
profiles can be received neither from the client nor from the server
of such netw
