subject:"Re\: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... Was Re\: \[BEHAVE\] Lack of need for 66nat \: Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers"

RE: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... Was Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers

2008-12-01 Thread Tony Hain

Cullen Jennings wrote: I'm sure that the IAB and IESG is keenly interested in this topic but everyone that cares is subscribed to behave. While I agree that everyone interested in defining nat behavior is subscribed to Behave, I doubt that everyone in the application community is, yet every

Re: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... Was Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers

2008-12-01 Thread Cullen Jennings

Fair Enough. I was not thinking of the behave mailing list as presuming the answer but I see your point. On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:30 , Tony Hain wrote: Cullen Jennings wrote: I'm sure that the IAB and IESG is keenly interested in this topic but everyone that cares is subscribed to behave.