I agree with you John, I also not objecting it but wanted more meaning into
the report when I receive it, as I suggested before for clarifications.
I don't think majority in IETF think it is meaningless so that is why I
want to clarify the meaning and discuss what most may not want to discuss.
If
If one or two people are doing most of the posting to a list, that means
something is out of balance. Summary statistics can be used as an
indicator that something should be done to encourage diversity, or get
people back on topic, etc.
On Aug 5, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with you John, I also not objecting it but wanted more meaning into
the report when I receive it, as I suggested before for clarifications.
It's just a weekly posting summary of raw stats - it's not a
On 3 Aug 2013 11:14, Ole Jacobsen (ole) o...@cisco.com wrote:
It was never a distraction until AB started complaining about it. Been
serving a useful purpose for many, many years. Procmail is your friend.
+1 for that
--- Roger ---
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor Publisher
http://cisco.com/ipj
All,
If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting
summary - I strongly object.
I don't think its main benefit is be to stop excessive or of topic
posting. I'm not saying that list managers and list owners should look
at that aspect.
At least for me it serves as a safety net
If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting
summary - I strongly object.
As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine.
Seems like rough consensus to me.
R's,
John
On 8/4/13 11:53 AM, John Levine wrote:
As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine.
More to the point, the objections that are being raised appear
to be bogus and based in a misunderstanding of how the IETF
operates.
Melinda
On 04/08/13 20:53, John Levine wrote:
If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting
summary - I strongly object.
As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine.
Seems like rough consensus to me.
+1
Aaron
R's,
John
On 4 Aug 2013, at 20:53, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting
summary - I strongly object.
As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine.
Seems like rough consensus to me.
And the code is running…
Tim
--On Sunday, August 04, 2013 19:53 + John Levine
jo...@taugh.com wrote:
If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting
summary - I strongly object.
As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks
it's fine.
I do not want to be recorded as thinking it is
First, I'd like to highlight something that is important. There is no inherent
preference to posting a lot, a moderate amount, or none at all. Everything
depends on context. If you are providing useful input and furthering the
discussion, a lot of mails is ok. And no mails can be a problem,
On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in
each week).
However, in my comment below I
will follow the week as done in world
Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com:
On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5
in each
Hi,
I don't care if this report is published or not, but I will point
out that the 1 week sample period is not that useful if
the intent is to spot excessive posting.
Somebody could be following up on 1 thread, and not post again
for a year. Somebody could be participating in an IETF Last Call
It was never a distraction until AB started complaining about it. Been serving
a useful purpose for many, many years. Procmail is your friend.
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor Publisher
http://cisco.com/ipj
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 3, 2013, at 9:12, Heasley h...@shrubbery.net wrote:
Am Aug 3, 2013
I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5
in each
week).
There are seven days in most weeks, in my experience.
I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday
I suggest that anyone who wants something different simply writes code for
something
On Aug 3, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote:
I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5
in each
week).
There are seven days in most weeks, in my experience.
I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday
I suggest that
On 08/03/13 05:48, Adrian Farrel allegedly wrote:
Have you considered not reading it?
+1. Especially during IETF week, people on various lists are losing
track of their delete key, or the ability to set mail filter rules.
18 matches
Mail list logo
