--On Friday, March 08, 2013 18:57 -0500 Jari Arkko
jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
FWIW, I do believe that noncoms may decide for themselves what
the final requirements are for specific positions. This is
true in this case as well. The IESG has a role to send the
starting point for these
John == John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com writes:
John confidential or not) or getting into public discussions about
John qualifications for a position while that position is under
John active consideration by the Nomcom (not because the
John qualifications should be an issue but
--On Saturday, March 09, 2013 10:31 -0500 Sam Hartman
hartmans-i...@mit.edu wrote:
John == John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com writes:
John confidential or not) or getting into public
discussions about John qualifications for a position
while that position is under John active
