Sam Hartman wrote:
It seems quite clear to me that RFC 2418 does not apply at all to the
output of an RG.
Sam,
I've looked around and the WG Guidelines doc happens to be the only place I
could find that defines the purpose of a Last Call. The mere fact that the title
of document
On 11/7/08 at 9:38 AM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
It seems quite clear to me that RFC 2418 does not apply at all to
the output of an RG.
I've looked around and the WG Guidelines doc happens to be the only
place I could find that defines the purpose of a Last Call. The mere
Pete == Pete Resnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pete http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4844.txt
Pete http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-rfcs-03.txt
Pete We have (IMO) historically screwed up with regard to IRTF
Pete and individual documents and not given them a proper stream
Pete
clear to me that RFC 2418 does not apply at all to the
output of an RG.
I've looked around and the WG Guidelines doc happens to be the only
place I could find that defines the purpose of a Last Call. The mere
fact that the title of document is about working groups doesn't
obviously limit
