sigh Typo
ns1.sea1.afilias-nst.info (Seattle)
199.19.49.79
Make it 199.19.50.79, instead of 199.19.49.79, above
Ray
Ray Pelletier wrote:
Well, the good news is that Afilias has agreed to provide DNS services
to the IETF. The bad news is I gave out incorrect addresses. Here
are the
Well, the good news is that Afilias has agreed to provide DNS services to
the IETF. The bad news is I gave out incorrect addresses. Here are the
correct addresses for the nameservers:
ns1.ams1.afilias-nst.info (Amsterdam)
199.19.48.79
2001:500:6::79
ns1.yyz1.afilias-nst.info
sigh Typo
ns1.sea1.afilias-nst.info (Seattle)
199.19.49.79
Make it 199.19.50.79, instead of 199.19.49.79, above
Ray
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
On Dec 13, 2007 10:48 AM, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
We knew about this problem, but choose to make the
You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
We knew about this problem, but choose to make the announcement
anyway. We are in the process of working out a secondary. I got a
I've changed the subject line because, if this turns into a
discussion, it will be a different one...
--On Wednesday, 12 December, 2007 22:22 -0800 Dave Crocker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
2. If the machines the DNS entries point to are, themselves, a
single point of failure, it's not clear
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM -0500,
John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 40 lines which said:
IMO, it would be really helpful if relevant WGs or other groups
concerned with DNS operations and configurations would take the
question up again, review it, and make some sort
--On Thursday, 13 December, 2007 17:35 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM -0500,
John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 40 lines which said:
IMO, it would be really helpful if relevant WGs or other
groups concerned with
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM -0500,
John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 40 lines which said:
IMO, it would be really helpful if relevant WGs or other
groups concerned with DNS operations and configurations would
take the question up again, review it, and
Afilias has agreed to provide DNS services to the IETF. What this
means is all DNS servers will be dual-homed on both IPv4 and IPv6,
and servers will be available in Asia, North America, and Europe as
follows:
ns1.ams1.afilias-nst.info (Amsterdam)
199.19.48.151
199.19.48.171
It is time to begin the process of transitioning IETF IT services
from Neustar Secretariat Services (NSS) to Association Management
Solutions (AMS). The complete process will take place over
approximately 7 weeks, beginning Friday, 14 December 2007, and
continuing through Thursday, 31 January
Hello Ray ,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Ray Pelletier wrote:
It is time to begin the process of transitioning IETF IT services
from Neustar Secretariat Services (NSS) to Association Management
Solutions (AMS). The complete process will take place over
approximately 7 weeks, beginning Friday,
Hello Ray ,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Ray Pelletier wrote:
It is time to begin the process of transitioning IETF IT services
from Neustar Secretariat Services (NSS) to Association Management
Solutions (AMS). The complete process will take place over
approximately 7 weeks, beginning
Mark Andrews wrote:
Hello Ray ,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Ray Pelletier wrote:
Will all be changed to the following:
NS4.AMSL.COM64.170.98.30
NS5.AMSL.COM64.170.98.31
NS6.AMSL.COM2001:5c0:9758::1:1
Fmi , Are the preceding name servers physically
Mark Andrews wrote:
Hello Ray ,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Ray Pelletier wrote:
Will all be changed to the following:
NS4.AMSL.COM64.170.98.30
NS5.AMSL.COM64.170.98.31
NS6.AMSL.COM2001:5c0:9758::1:1
Fmi , Are the preceding name servers
Brian Dickson wrote:
The question that is more critical is, are there any elements which
aren't common failure points?
There are two views that make sense:
1. The servers should be on different tectonic plates (and power sources) and
probably different continents; or
2. If the machines
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:11:47PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
Hello Ray ,
Brian
You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:11:47PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
Hello Ray ,
Brian
You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
It is time to begin the process of transitioning IETF IT services
from Neustar Secretariat Services (NSS) to Association Management
Solutions (AMS). The complete process will take place over
approximately 7 weeks, beginning Friday, 14 December 2007, and
continuing through Thursday, 31 January
19 matches
Mail list logo
