The Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir) WG in the Applications and
Real-Time Area of the IETF is undergoing rechartering. The IESG has not made
any determination yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is
provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the
This looks reasonable to me and given how much effort it has taken to get
agreement on theses words, I am not keen on any of the material changes I have
seen proposed.
On Aug 21, 2013, at 11:52 AM, The IESG iesg-secret...@ietf.org wrote:
A new IETF working group has been proposed in the
The following mostly are points that I raised within the group's mailing
list discussion, during charter development. In my view, they have not
yet been adequately resolved:
On 8/21/2013 10:52 AM, The IESG wrote:
Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg
at ietf.org) by
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
The following mostly are points that I raised within the group's mailing
list discussion, during charter development. In my view, they have not yet
been adequately resolved:
On 8/21/2013 10:52 AM, The IESG wrote:
+ iesg
-iesg-secretary
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
The following mostly are points that I raised within the group's mailing
list discussion, during charter development.
On Aug 21, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
use a particular telephone number for an incoming call has no obvious and
it'd actually be kind of nice if the focus was NOT on the (us)
10-digit number, but instead on the 'identity' making the call.
There's a
I noticed in a few places the suggestion to replace telephone number
with 'identity'.
I think that this is a particularly bad enhancement given how widely the
term identity is understood by most people.
In RFC 6973 we defined the term (which is inline with many of the
identity management
