On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Having to choose between /60 and /48 would be much better than having
to choose between /64 and bigger in general, as it removes the will
I ever need a second subnet consideration, the average allocation
size goes
On 3-jun-2006, at 5:33, Steven Blake wrote:
I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
ratios 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making
address
allocations to larger providers). I believe that:
(1) this would not solve a real problem,
A little
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:12:28PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 3-jun-2006, at 5:33, Steven Blake wrote:
I am concerned about the conclusion reached in this document (that HD
ratios 0.8 and closer to 0.94 should be considered when making
address
allocations to larger providers).
