if you do that, I hope you will edit to manageable and understandable proportions...
:-/
v
At 10:50 PM 9/24/2003 +1000, Laird, James wrote:
>Maybe we should put together a summary of the discussion and send it to
>ICANN?
Vint Cerf
SVP Technology Strategy
MCI
22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
Vint wrote:
>if there is a strong ietf consensus that this practice should be ended,
>it would be helpful to find a way to express that, to add to the
>expressions from iab and secsac.
There seems to be only one person on this mailing list who does not agree
that the practice is inappropriate.
Ma
Keith;
Your mistake (or, is it intentional?) is to have narrowed the focus
of the discussion that your point is on a minor protocol issue of
an e-mail protocol.
Yes, you should conclude it.
> In general, trying to teach things to people with read-only minds is an
> exercise in futility.
Exactly
Keith is very right. This discussion is accomplishing nothing. All it is
doing is trying to write to read-only minds (nice turn of phrase Keith) and
wasting time.
The question is - what now? Sit and watch Verisign abuse their custodianship
by feeding us advertising?
--James
Disclaimer: Whilst ev
folks,
It should be obvious by now that there are people who stubbornly believe
that Big Companies have the Inalienable Right to screw Hundreds of Millions
of Individual Users if it makes them lots of money and if it doesn't happen to
violate the letter of an IETF protocol. Presumably those same
