> "Joel" == Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joel> I've recieved 3 dozen or so responses from people on the mailing
Joel> list who have automated vacation scripts. Please if you must use a
Joel> vaction script on your mail either unsubscribe from the mailing
Joel> list
people who have
had to deal the effluent.
-Original Message-
From: Vernon Schryver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: guidance (re: social event politeness)
> From: Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anothe
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:47:00 -0500, John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Ted Gavin wrote:
>
>> >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (...
>>
>> Don't blame the product - in this case the blame rests firmly upon the
>> user. I used that product for years and managed to avoid spamming this
>> or
...and speaking of bad manners, I noticed that there is a resurgence of
people talking mobile-phone calls in meetings. I was only there for one day
but it happened twice in three meetings. Another annoyance is those who
allow it to ring and then cancel the call (presumably using CLI or
somethi
Ted Gavin wrote:
> >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (...
>
> Don't blame the product - in this case the blame rests firmly upon the
> user. I used that product for years and managed to avoid spamming this
> or any other list with useless information about my travel schedule.
Yes, but why is
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:13:49 -0700 (MST), Vernon Schryver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Another common curtesy issue this thread has raised is vacation scripts...
>>
>> I've recieved 3 dozen or so responses from people on the mailing list who
>> have au
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> in any event mailing lists traffice should not generate such a response.
Anybody from the Exchange team listening? Nearly all the offenders are using
Exchange. It doesn't make MS look good. :-)
--
/==\
|John Str
> From: Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Another common curtesy issue this thread has raised is vacation scripts...
>
> I've recieved 3 dozen or so responses from people on the mailing list who
> have automated vacation scripts. Please if you must use a vaction script
> on your mail either unsu
Another common curtesy issue this thread has raised is vacation scripts...
I've recieved 3 dozen or so responses from people on the mailing list who
have automated vacation scripts. Please if you must use a vaction script
on your mail either unsubscribe from the mailing list while you're gone,
us
On 14 Dec 2000, Sean Doran wrote:
> I believe at least some of this is unacceptable behaviour
> that cannot be overlooked simply by virtue of general
> disorganization or industry competitiveness, and look for
> guidance about how we should (collectively) police such
> poorly-socialized people, i
Thanks for the feedback, public and private.
It is pretty clear that we attendees should talk to
Qualcomm and Cisco about the disorganization of the social
event. Our individual account team or sales people seem
like good targets for complaints.
However, wrt queue-jumping, there is a serious q
At 16.18 -0800 00-12-13, Steve Conner wrote:
>You would think that a convention full of networking folk would have
>prepared better for congestion control. :-)
As long as you don't start doing fragmenting.
paf
--
> Is it appropriate to name & shame people
Be liberal in the abuse you accept, and conservative in the abuse you dole
out.
- RL "Bob"
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:42:25PM -0800, Scott Brim wrote:
> ... Second, the overcrowding at the social
> event was such that it was clear there was a very good chance that if
> you weren't at the front of a "line" you would not get what you wanted
> ever. Ever. Not a situation we face very of
CTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: guidance (re: social event politeness)
>
>
> > Sean Doran wrote:
> >
> > > Is it appropriate to name & shame people who were cutting into
> > > line yesterday during the social eve
You would think that a convention full of networking folk would have
prepared better for congestion control. :-)
- Original Message -
From: "John Stracke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: guid
On 13 Dec 2000 at 14:50 -0800, Randy Bush apparently wrote:
> my wife, a preschool teacher was in oslo. she said that she had never
> conceived that so many add (attention deficit) people could be in one
> place. our population has an overly high proportion of people who
> think that they are mo
Sean Doran wrote:
> Is it appropriate to name & shame people who were cutting into
> line yesterday during the social event, yet who did not admit to
> and fix the error of their ways when it was pointed out that this
> unfair behaviour is inappropriate?
I will admit that I cut once, basically
my wife, a preschool teacher was in oslo. she said that she had never
conceived that so many add (attention deficit) people could be in one
place. our population has an overly high proportion of people who
think that they are more 'important' than everyone else, the kind of
folk who cut in plane
> Those few of you who shrugged off a polite suggestion to join the
> back of the queue: we know who you are, and are prepared to identify
> you in front of thousands of your colleagues in the industry
This is definately an RFC.
We also need a BCP for where to hold conversations. (Hint: NOT i
Hi -
Is it appropriate to name & shame people who were cutting into
line yesterday during the social event, yet who did not admit to
and fix the error of their ways when it was pointed out that this
unfair behaviour is inappropriate?
Those few of you who shrugged off a polite suggestion to
21 matches
Mail list logo
