Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05

2012-10-04 Thread Sam Hartman
Richard == Richard Barnes rbar...@bbn.com writes: Richard The security considerations in this document are difficult Richard to evaluate because the general architecture is unclear to Richard me, e.g., who attaches these names to things and who reads Richard them. (The naming

secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05

2012-10-03 Thread Richard Barnes
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like

Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05

2012-10-03 Thread Sam Hartman
Richard == Richard Barnes rbar...@bbn.com writes: Richard I have reviewed this document as part of the security Richard directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents Richard being processed by the IESG. These comments were written Richard primarily for the benefit of