Check with the lawyers, but I think that you will find that this
is strictly a US view of patents. In every other country any public
disclosure anywhere immediately voids the right to patent. Even
NDA disclosure can be tricky, because an offer for sale counts
as a disclosure.
Stewart
Doug
Salvador Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that as much conflicts that can be solved without the traditional
way: regulation + represion = burocracy + injustice, will be better for
users.
But on privacy questions we can try first to give technical solutions, i.e.
ways to follow stamped data
Title: MPLS and Private Network
Dear Friends,
A company consists of 2 remotely separated sites, A and B. A leased T1 line connects the networks on these 2 sites together. We generally call the company's network a private network since the connection between the 2 sites are private leased
Brijesh Kumar wrote:
Granting of patents only means that a person grated a particular patent
was first to make "a claim" about the novelty of an idea or technique
as far as the patent office knows on the basis of "previous claims submitted
to it.".
At least in the US, at least sometimes,
Masataka Ohta wrote:
We can have servers outside of US and there is no legislation (even
under US laws. note that the servers can serve yet another countries)
to make the servers illegal.
Mmm...that sounds like a grey area. A company using patented tech to do
business in the US may be
I am writing to request that the RFC Editor not publish
draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt as an RFC in its current form,
for the following reasons:
1. The document repeatedly, and misleadingly, refers to NECP as a
standard. I do not believe this is appropriate for a document
which is not on the IETF
Hi,
The RMONMIB WG intends to hold an interim meeting to
work on all aspects of the new charter. This includes:
- Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
- Transport Performance Metrics (TPM)
- User-Defined TopN Monitoring MIB (UsrTopN)
- DIFFSERV Monitoring MIB (DS-MON)
Meeting
John;
We can have servers outside of US and there is no legislation (even
under US laws. note that the servers can serve yet another countries)
to make the servers illegal.
Mmm...that sounds like a grey area. A company using patented tech to do
business in the US may be subject to US
Note: forwarded message attached.
=
Ben Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Attn: Mr.John Roemer; Reporter for the Pacific
Standard
and Ms. Donna Soto; VP
I am writing to request that the RFC Editor not publish
draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt as an RFC in its current form,
for the following reasons:
2. A primary purpose of the NECP protocol appears to be to
facilitate the operation of so-called interception proxies. Such
proxies violate the
10 matches
Mail list logo
