Glenn Parsons wrote:
Folks,
I just tried to send a message to Marconi (to the address indicated on
the IETF 48 social site) querying about tax being charged on the
social event when you reserve on the website. I received the
following NDN.
Has anyone else tried this address?
Thanks,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Provided your message fits into 160 characters.
- --murton
- -Original Message-
From: Graham Klyne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2000 17:59
To: Vernon Schryver
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WAP - What A Problem...
At 07:22
Well I guess when you look at multiple technologies like
VR (voice recognition), VN (voice navigation), IA (intelligent agents),
WAP of course, Then you begin to see the relationships and importance
of wireless applications. I concur with you on the point of land optics
however the average
I like that close!
-Original Message-
From: Gilbert Cattoire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 1:12 PM
To: Anthony Atkielski; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WAP - What A Problem...
At 18:29 +0200 29/06/00, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
I don't understand why so much
Great Catch. It doesn't get any more Mobile on the Internet then that!
-Original Message-
From: Parkinson, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 8:24 AM
To: 'Lars-Erik Jonsson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is WAP mobile Internet??
Okay WAP at the moment is
Good Point I will tap into Japan Wireless infra-structure!
-Original Message-
From: Renfield Kuroda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 9:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is WAP mobile Internet??
I don't think WAP Mobile Internet any more than TCP/IP is
The Internet allows all protocols to in-operate with her. This is the
uniqueness
of the web. Therefore WAP falls within this area!
-Original Message-
From: Lars-Erik Jonsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is WAP mobile
"Taylor, Johnny" wrote:
In addition to this point I would
like to also state WAP is the front runner in regards to linking
wireless apps to the Global Internet and her sub-nets.
I'd have to disagree there. The 8 million non-WAP users in Japan are unarguably
enjoying the most prolific, robust,
I concur with you on the point of land optics
however the average person requires remote and
mobile access to their corporate networks,
intra-nets, extra-nets, and value-added-networks.
The average person doesn't use any of these networks, and so does not
require access to them. There are
Well the web is indeed the Internet we are talking about
The Internet is an internet, but an internet is not an Internet always
Ashutosh Agarwal
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change your thoughts and you change your
I disagree, WAP, Wireless Application Protocol, Its a way of transmitting
data I.E. to and from the Web. How does this not fall under the Internet
Umbrella ?
Thanks
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Ashutosh Agarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 2:25 PM
To:
if i have a device which can only send and receive email, am i "on the
internet?"
if i have a device that lets me send and receive messages to/from internet
users, am i "on the internet"
note that sms with a gateway satisfies the last one.
my point is not to push sms or whatever. but that by
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Stewart Nolan wrote:
The web sits atop the internet, as do the protocols mentioned, as does
WAP.
Yes - the Internet in my mind is just a collection of protocols, be they
what they may. Over what physical medium data travel is irrelevant, but
doesn't the term "on the
--Original Message-
-From: Jon Crowcroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:19 AM
-To: Parkinson, Jonathan
-Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Subject: Re: Is WAP mobile Internet??
-
-
-
-In message
-[EMAIL PROTECTED],
-"Parkinson, Jonathan" typed:
-
Jon, I wonder how WAP will fit into Multicast apps - even
if its single line txt based msg's app ?
football scores/(tennis etc)
share price (look at stockbroker trading terminal - they have very
small amount of realestate for the given instrument)
many many things would work v. well -
From: Lloyd Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
my point is not to push sms or whatever. but that by "on the internet" i
think we mean having unincumbered availability of the common application
protocols, email, http, ftp, ssh, ...
that's not quite enough; in the UK we're seeing cable-modem
Vernon,
would pacbell filtering all multicast at all CPE equipemt fall into your
bucket, where do you draw the line?
-rick
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Vernon Schryver wrote:
From: Lloyd Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
my point is not to push sms or whatever. but that by "on the internet" i
News from our host city...
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 00:14:02 -0700
Subject: Online criticism of politicians draws lawsuit
From: Jack Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online criticism of politicians draws lawsuit
City: Pittsburgh, State: PA, Country: United
* From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 5 08:58:47 2000
* To: "Parkinson, Jonathan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: Re: Is WAP mobile Internet??
* In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 2000 15:15:13 BST."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Postel would have said: If it speaks IP (UDP/TCP are not
necessary), then it's Internet, else not.
I thought part of the argument was about capitalization of the I. if its
lowercase, then its using IP, if its uppercase then you can expect to use
global Internet addresses and achieve a
21 matches
Mail list logo
