As the maintainer of the Linksys Blue Box Router HOWTO, I am quite well
aware of this fact. And if my objective were to have exciting adventures
in system and network administration, I would have reflashed my Linksys
long since.
I don't want to have exciting adventures in system and
scott bradner wrote:
bert goes on to ask
OTOH if ISOC received an unexpected donation for IETF purposes, that
should be transferred promptly - does this need to be stated
somewhere?
I would assume, that if such a donations was indeed for IETF purposes
that it would then be earmarked as such or
Geoff Huston wrote:
At 12:15 AM 27/11/2004, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
In revision draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-00.txt we have text in sections
5 through 5.4 about IASA funding and where the money needs to
be kept. Specifically, the current text suggests that there
is/are one or more IASA specific bank
Folks -
I've recently been asked to review a number of works in progress related to
restructuring and other similar things. Those documents were liberally
splattered with references to various
IDs (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt,
Michael == Michael StJohns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael It seems to me that neither ID status nor RFC status are
Michael appropriate for these documents. The ID series is, by
Michael design, ephemeral and generally not citeable. The RFC
Michael series is stable and
--On tirsdag, november 30, 2004 12:13:41 -0500 Michael StJohns
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks -
I've recently been asked to review a number of works in progress related
to restructuring and other similar things. Those documents were
liberally splattered with references to various IDs
At 12:49 PM 11/30/2004, Sam Hartman wrote:
Michael == Michael StJohns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael It seems to me that neither ID status nor RFC status are
Michael appropriate for these documents. The ID series is, by
Michael design, ephemeral and generally not citeable. The
Mike,
As the other co-author to
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-newtrk-cruft-00.txt,
[...]Its unclear that either the work in progress or the cited drafts
will ever be published as RFCs. Its also unclear that this
(restructuring etc) will be resolved within the 6 month lifetime
Sorry, in this I must disagree. We are in an international situation and
we want simple to read for everyone, crystal clear statements in due time
by third party. The only certified situation reports we have in case of
conflict is a neat banking monthly statement.
Another complex issue where an
Thus spake Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually in IPv6 you are well-protected against random scanning withough
the need for any device in the middle: a /64 subnet is so large, that
scanning it is completely infeasible.
Now of course someone who knows your address doesn't have to
Thus spake Tim Chown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't say that your mother could do this, but given that some amateurs
have already modified the Linksys to do v6 then it would not be difficult
for Cisco/Linksys to do so in a short timeframe, if they chose to.
The interesting question is why
11 matches
Mail list logo
