Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

2013-02-05 Thread t . p .
- Original Message - From: Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net To: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu Cc: Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com; ietf ietf@ietf.org; Lixia Zhang li...@cs.ucla.edu Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 6:38 PM On 2/3/2013 10:28 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: I'm not

Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

2013-02-05 Thread t . p .
Whoops, I lost a 'not' Tom Petch - Original Message - From: Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net To: Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu Cc: Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com; ietf ietf@ietf.org; Lixia Zhang li...@cs.ucla.edu Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 6:38 PM On

Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

2013-02-05 Thread Eliot Lear
On 2/3/13 7:38 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: On 2/3/2013 10:28 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: I'm not sure I've ever been involved with a WG where you could have gotten consensus on any of the above enough to publish it. Nor can I think of many WGs that have the excess energy to do this work. Even

Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

2013-02-05 Thread John C Klensin
--On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:38 +0100 Eliot Lear l...@cisco.com wrote: So don't try. +1. In fact in the ITU context they will sometimes spend half a day on a meeting report. I really don't think we want to go there. What I would like not to have happen is that we spend any

Re: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10

2013-02-05 Thread Lou Berger
Dan/Richard, On 2/4/2013 10:05 PM, Lidan (Dan) wrote: Hi Richard, Thanks for the review of this draft! Section 2.1. Would be helpful to either include the old formats and/or say explicitly what is changing. Added the original format of Config, ConfigAck and ConfigNack

Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

2013-02-05 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:38:29PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote: farther, and say that the whole endeavor should be. But having at least a record from individauls about what *they* said or meant is, I suppose, not unreasonable. Indeed. And this (and the rest of the posts in this thread) in fact

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10

2013-02-05 Thread Lou Berger
Richard, Thank you for the review. I have one additional question/response on your comments: On 2/3/2013 2:13 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please

Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03

2013-02-05 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Yakov Shafranovich wrote: [...] I am interested in this situation: - Someone wants to publish database contents or schema - Use DB-specific dumping tool to create .sql file - Puts .sql file on web server - Server associates .sql with proposed media type - Someone else downloads this

Re: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10

2013-02-05 Thread Richard Barnes
Hey Lou, That text looks fine to me! --Richard On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net wrote: Dan/Richard, On 2/4/2013 10:05 PM, Lidan (Dan) wrote: Hi Richard, Thanks for the review of this draft! Section 2.1. Would be helpful to either include the old

Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03

2013-02-05 Thread Yakov Shafranovich
I would agree that in this scenario the ISO standard would not help since it would only govern how the SQL client talks to the db server, not when it is placed on a web server. I think the situation is actually very similar to the one described in RFC 6657 where there maybe a conflict between the

Re: Remote Participation Services

2013-02-05 Thread Abdussalam Baryun
Dear IETF Chair, In the previous ietf meeting in July, I have submitted an I-D in one WG but had no chance to present my participation remotely, as you mention in 2.5. I would like the solution and that I will be able to present remotely. I asked the WG if someone can present for me but only WG

Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03

2013-02-05 Thread Barry Leiba
The question is what happens when the SQL file itself carries no charset information, such as when using mysql-dump with the --skip-set-charset option. According to MYSQL, UTF-8 would be used in v5.1+ and ASCII in versions prior to that. Perhaps, we should leave charset as an optional

Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03

2013-02-05 Thread Yakov Shafranovich
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote: The question is what happens when the SQL file itself carries no charset information, such as when using mysql-dump with the --skip-set-charset option. According to MYSQL, UTF-8 would be used in v5.1+ and ASCII in

Remote Participation Services

2013-02-05 Thread IETF Chair
Please see the attached report on the current status of remote participation in the IETF meeting. Please notice at the end a call for potential experiments to explore ways that we can improve remote participation. Russ Housley IETF Chair Bob Hinden IAOC Chair = = = = = = = = = Status of

Last Call: draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04.txt (Applicability of Access Node Control Mechanism to PON based Broadband Networks) to Informational RFC

2013-02-05 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Access Node Control Protocol WG (ancp) to consider the following document: - 'Applicability of Access Node Control Mechanism to PON based Broadband Networks' draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04.txt as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the

Last Call: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.txt (REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol) to Proposed Standard

2013-02-05 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol WG (p2psip) to consider the following document: - 'REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol' draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.txt as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few