Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

2013-05-13 Thread Benoit Claise
Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

2013-05-13 Thread Benoit Claise
Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses the difference in the patterns. Is there a YANG rule that says tat if typedef X is derived from

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

2013-05-13 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
Joel, this is specified in the third paragraph of section 9.4.6 of RFC 6020: 9.4.6. The pattern Statement The pattern statement, which is an optional substatement to the type statement, takes as an argument a regular expression string, as defined in [XSD-TYPES]. It is used to

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

2013-05-13 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Thank you Juergen. I see that the pattern statement is therefore correct. And presumably it is a judgment call as to hw to write te new pattern to restrict the old one. Personally, I find a pattern statement that covers a whole lot of other things, but that happens when combined with the

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

2013-05-13 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Joel M. Halpern j...@joelhalpern.comwrote: I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses the difference in the patterns. Is there a YANG rule that says tat if

Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)

2013-05-13 Thread Stig Venaas
On 5/10/2013 8:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: Thanks Bing - The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resolution of referencing Tim's expired draft. So the solution is to not reference it? I see the name of the draft is mentioned in the acknowledgments as:

Re: Last Call: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC

2013-05-13 Thread Tom Vest
On May 11, 2013, at 11:17 AM, SM wrote: If it's a policy it cannot be a principle. Sorry, but unless you can point to some relevant real-world examples of self-executing, self-sustaining principles, or you're a nihilist and don't really believe that such things as principles exist at all,

Re: Last Call: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC

2013-05-13 Thread Tom Vest
On May 11, 2013, at 7:34 PM, SM wrote: At 13:08 11-05-2013, Tom Vest wrote: Sorry, but unless you can point to some relevant real-world examples of self-executing, self-sustaining principles, or you're a nihilist and don't really believe that such things as principles exist at all, this is

RE: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)

2013-05-13 Thread Liubing (Leo)
Hi, Robert Your careful review and comments really helped improving the document a lot. Many thanks to you. All the best, Bing -Original Message- From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:13 PM To: Liubing (Leo) Cc: re...@ietf.org;

Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07)

2013-05-13 Thread Tim Chown
Yes, thanks all - I think we're nearly thereā€¦ Tim On 13 May 2013, at 02:58, Liubing (Leo) leo.liub...@huawei.com wrote: Hi, Robert Your careful review and comments really helped improving the document a lot. Many thanks to you. All the best, Bing -Original Message- From:

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07

2013-05-13 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-forces-interop-07 Reviewer:

MalcolmBETTS90013533 is out of the office.

2013-05-13 Thread Malcolm . BETTS
I will be out of the office starting 10/05/2013 and will not return until 20/05/2013. I will not have access to email, I will respond to your message when I return on May 20th.

Re: Last Call: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC

2013-05-13 Thread SM
At 13:45 12-05-2013, Tom Vest wrote: I certainly did not intend to misrepresent your position. But given the fact that the part of a message that you reproduced was offered in response to doubts that you yourself raised about the points covered therein (esp. operational need), what is your

Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-08.txt (LDP Downstream-on-Demand in Seamless MPLS) to Proposed Standard

2013-05-13 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'LDP Downstream-on-Demand in Seamless MPLS' draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-08.txt as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final

NomCom 2013-2014 Call for Volunteers

2013-05-13 Thread Mankin, Allison
The IETF nominating committee (nomcom) process for 2010-11 has begun. The IETF nomcom appoints folks to fill the open slots on the IAOC, the IAB, and the IESG. Ten voting members for the nomcom are selected in a verifiably random way from a pool of volunteers. The more volunteers, the better